K.F.C. Wrote:But it's not just a coincidence that a dood who admins on a site that throws that word around so liberally is arguing about it and crying about hypocrisy. That's all.
You didn't pay attention to this thread very well, did you?
Leu gets it, I'm not here to try to impose any rules or moderation or anything that would be absurd.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Back on topic - there seems to have been some misinformation given by one of your members:
E-Judge Wrote:There are no rules at IT, we have a jail. IT members don't like rules imposed apon them, thus the, " I owned ON cause I was banned."
Please limit jailing to site offenses, ie: No one flames Ownster !
IT members, please keep it to and individual attack intead of site attacks. We'll keep it on Ownster and not let it bleed over to IT in respect to Lee and the IT members that are clueless to flaming.
Ownster is and always was a Flame Forum, now we have other sections that make it an interesting forum also. Lets keep it contained.
thanks,
The Mngmt
Obviously E-judge is near 100% wrong in this post, directly quoted from Ownster. First, the rules, or lack thereof: He gave us the impression that IT is a FFA forum. He said this so many times I'd be a millionaire if I got a nickel... well you get the idea. Second, ON is not a strictly flame forum anymore, that got boring a long time ago. Over 95% of current threads are not intended to house a piss battle. Third, he is not "The Mngmt" (LOL).
In any case, it was just a shock to me that this site is exactly the opposite of what E-judge made it out to be. I have no problem with this btw. Also, I noticed it was a shock to you guys that paid us our most recent visit that you were disappointed by the lack of current "smack" threads there. I wonder why this is⦠Maybe because of something I said in the paragraph above this one?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, it's true. Censoring is not as big of a deal at ON. However, for someone to accuse me of using the word in a hateful way over at my site when you obviously have not had membership long enough to be able to say that with certainty, is absurd. For someone to generalize an entire population of people based off the actions of one or two people is absurd. Some of you here are guilty of this, and that is part of my point.
Backing up a bit: yes, some members at ON do throw the word around, and whether they intend it in a hateful way or not is not my business, nor is it any of yours, as Leu has pointed out, at least twice in this thread.