[cLaY]

I'm leaving, but I'll be back once AssHole is gone. Thanks.

[asshat]

I'm leaving, but I'll be back once AssHole is gone. Thanks.

Looks like tomorrow may be your lucky day.

narg:

[cLaY]

Looks like tomorrow may be your lucky day.

narg:

quit being a pussy damn it

[asshat]

quit being a pussy damn it

What is being a pussy about posting an opinion about an obviously stupid stunt.

The two moderators for this site are:

Banana (a good choice, she is very helpful and has $$$ posts)

and

Snarg :roll:

[leucetios]

What is being a pussy about posting an opinion about an obviously stupid stunt.

The two moderators for this site are:

Banana (a good choice, she is very helpful and has $$$ posts)

and

Snarg :roll:

not that it would change anything, but out of curiosity, who would you have picked and why

[asshat]

not that it would change anything, but out of curiosity, who would you have picked and why

http://www.insanetrain.com/forums/memberlist.php? minus snarg.

[leucetios]

:roll: That was my fault, sorry.

[asshat]

Purple Haze
Clay
VitaminE
TomF
8
LFC
SizeMatters
Mich
Greg
SanDog
NCHammer


Just off the top of my head.

[leucetios]

Purple Haze
Clay
VitaminE
TomF
8
LFC
SizeMatters
Mich
Greg
SanDog
NCHammer


Just off the top of my head.

reasons

[asshat]

reasons

Better for the site.

and add MinorThreat although he isn't on much.

[Undeadcannibal]

I can't quite recall banana ever making a post worth my time, but snarg actually knows how to not be a dickface.

[asshat]

And add UDC.

[leucetios]

Better for the site.

and add MinorThreat although he isn't on much.

by some people's argument so is bdic. And he's not mod material - he's proved that. So give a real, thought out reason, of shut the fuck up cause all you're doing is waving your tiny dick around trying to get attention

[asshat]

by some people's argument so is bdic. And he's not mod material - he's proved that. So give a real, thought out reason, of shut the fuck up cause all you're doing is waving your tiny dick around trying to get attention

Wow, "better for the site" is not a good reason. And bdic wasn't on my list.

It is nice to know the logic that goes into decisions, when "better for the site" doesn't count. Next time I hire a foreman or promote someone in my company, I'll make a note not to count "better for the company" when I make that decision. :joff:

[PurpleHaze]

I can't quite recall banana ever making a post worth my time, but snarg actually knows how to not be a dickface.

Where the hell have you been?

[asshat]

Where the hell have you been?

Exactly.

[leucetios]

Wow, "better for the site" is not a good reason. And bdic wasn't on my list.

It is nice to know the logic that goes into decisions, when "better for the site" doesn't count. Next time I hire a foreman or promote someone in my company, I'll make a note not to count "better for the company" when I make that decision. :joff:

"better for the site" is subjective. I never said bdic was on your list, I said that by some people's arguments he is better for the site, and so if that is your only criteria, then it is a very weak one. Define what makes someone better for the site. It would also be helpful if you could throw some quantitative qualities in there too

[Banana]

Where the hell have you been?

:wub: for PH

[Banana]

Exactly.

:wub: for asshat

[asshat]

"better for the site" is subjective. I never said bdic was on your list, I said that by some people's arguments he is better for the site, and so if that is your only criteria, then it is a very weak one. Define what makes someone better for the site. It would also be helpful if you could throw some quantitative qualities in there too

No, I don't think I need to define what "better for the site" means. I think that is pretty self explanatory.

Not that it will make any difference, but what qualifications do you feel snarg has that make him better than everyone else that was overlooked?