Retirement Thread -
cLaY - 03-11-2005
I'm leaving, but I'll be back once AssHole is gone. Thanks.
Retirement Thread -
asshat - 03-11-2005
cLaY Wrote:I'm leaving, but I'll be back once AssHole is gone. Thanks.
Looks like tomorrow may be your lucky day.

narg:
Retirement Thread -
cLaY - 03-11-2005
Asshat Wrote:Looks like tomorrow may be your lucky day.
narg:
quit being a pussy damn it
Retirement Thread -
asshat - 03-11-2005
cLaY Wrote:quit being a pussy damn it
What is being a pussy about posting an opinion about an obviously stupid stunt.
The two moderators for this site are:
Banana (a good choice, she is very helpful and has $$$ posts)
and
Snarg :roll:
Retirement Thread - leucetios - 03-11-2005
Asshat Wrote:What is being a pussy about posting an opinion about an obviously stupid stunt.
The two moderators for this site are:
Banana (a good choice, she is very helpful and has $$$ posts)
and
Snarg :roll:
not that it would change anything, but out of curiosity, who would you have picked and why
Retirement Thread -
asshat - 03-11-2005
leucetios Wrote:not that it would change anything, but out of curiosity, who would you have picked and why
http://www.insanetrain.com/forums/memberlist.php? minus snarg.
Retirement Thread - leucetios - 03-11-2005
:roll: That was my fault, sorry.
Retirement Thread -
asshat - 03-11-2005
Purple Haze
Clay
VitaminE
TomF
8
LFC
SizeMatters
Mich
Greg
SanDog
NCHammer
Just off the top of my head.
Retirement Thread - leucetios - 03-11-2005
Asshat Wrote:Purple Haze
Clay
VitaminE
TomF
8
LFC
SizeMatters
Mich
Greg
SanDog
NCHammer
Just off the top of my head.
reasons
Retirement Thread -
asshat - 03-11-2005
leucetios Wrote:reasons
Better for the site.
and add MinorThreat although he isn't on much.
Retirement Thread -
Undeadcannibal - 03-11-2005
I can't quite recall banana ever making a post worth my time, but snarg actually knows how to not be a dickface.
Retirement Thread -
asshat - 03-11-2005
And add UDC.
Retirement Thread - leucetios - 03-11-2005
Asshat Wrote:Better for the site.
and add MinorThreat although he isn't on much.
by some people's argument so is bdic. And he's not mod material - he's proved that. So give a real, thought out reason, of shut the fuck up cause all you're doing is waving your tiny dick around trying to get attention
Retirement Thread -
asshat - 03-11-2005
leucetios Wrote:by some people's argument so is bdic. And he's not mod material - he's proved that. So give a real, thought out reason, of shut the fuck up cause all you're doing is waving your tiny dick around trying to get attention
Wow, "better for the site" is not a good reason. And bdic wasn't on my list.
It is nice to know the logic that goes into decisions, when "better for the site" doesn't count. Next time I hire a foreman or promote someone in my company, I'll make a note not to count "better for the company" when I make that decision. :joff:
Retirement Thread - PurpleHaze - 03-11-2005
Undeadcannibal Wrote:I can't quite recall banana ever making a post worth my time, but snarg actually knows how to not be a dickface.
Where the hell have you been?
Retirement Thread -
asshat - 03-11-2005
PurpleHaze Wrote:Where the hell have you been?
Exactly.
Retirement Thread - leucetios - 03-11-2005
Asshat Wrote:Wow, "better for the site" is not a good reason. And bdic wasn't on my list.
It is nice to know the logic that goes into decisions, when "better for the site" doesn't count. Next time I hire a foreman or promote someone in my company, I'll make a note not to count "better for the company" when I make that decision. :joff:
"better for the site" is subjective. I never said bdic was on your list, I said that by some people's arguments he is better for the site, and so if that is your only criteria, then it is a very weak one. Define what makes someone better for the site. It would also be helpful if you could throw some quantitative qualities in there too
Retirement Thread - Banana - 03-11-2005
PurpleHaze Wrote:Where the hell have you been?
:wub: for PH
Retirement Thread - Banana - 03-11-2005
Asshat Wrote:Exactly.
:wub: for asshat
Retirement Thread -
asshat - 03-11-2005
leucetios Wrote:"better for the site" is subjective. I never said bdic was on your list, I said that by some people's arguments he is better for the site, and so if that is your only criteria, then it is a very weak one. Define what makes someone better for the site. It would also be helpful if you could throw some quantitative qualities in there too
No, I don't think I need to define what "better for the site" means. I think that is pretty self explanatory.
Not that it will make any difference, but what qualifications do you feel snarg has that make him better than everyone else that was overlooked?