06-17-2006, 01:55 AM
SanDog Wrote:The case sited is not really relevant to this issue. As for legal standing, I would guess that would all depend on the TOS of the site in question, the way I read them you are wrong. What he posted is 1st ammendment protected, unless it was threats, and they cannot be construed that way based on tone and history, so your analogy does not jibe either.
You are entitled to your opinion, my CF compatriot, but we should really let the lawyers handle this.
It's a waste of time. If he wants to waste it...whatever. He's opening himself up to having his own e-activities put under a microscope, and under current legislation, CF could theoretically sue HIM for trolling.