[pepsi]

pick a topic and the debate will begin.

[retiredroadie]

Shouldnt the topic be left up to the one starting the thread?

Discuss.....

[CodeWarrior]

Originally posted by retiredroadie@Aug 29 2004, 12:32 PM
Shouldnt the topic be left up to the one starting the thread?

Discuss.....

[snapback]66681[/snapback]

Yes, end of discussion.

[pepsi]

Well i have numerous amount of topics i debate with my friends about, but i thought it be better somebody else pick a topic so I can have new debate material to argue.

[NinjaBassist]

How many guys could one girl pleasure at once? I say 6.

[pepsi]

Originally posted by NinjaBassist@Aug 30 2004, 03:12 AM
How many guys could one girl pleasure at once? I say 6.

[snapback]66789[/snapback]

I would say 7 sometimes 8 or 9. A guy for each hand for her to stroke it off, a guy to fuck her mouth maybe 2, a guy to fuck her in her pussy hmm again maybe 2 if shes that loose, a guy to fuck her in the ass and 2 guys to be sucking on her tits.

[Mech]

Originally posted by pepsi@Aug 29 2004, 10:21 PM
I would say 7 sometimes 8 or 9. A guy for each hand for her to stroke it off, a guy to fuck her mouth maybe 2, a guy to fuck her in her pussy hmm again maybe 2 if shes that loose, a guy to fuck her in the ass and 2 guys to be sucking on her tits.

[snapback]66790[/snapback]

That is the most retarded shit I've read all day. No offense. :op:

[SnD's Stinky Pussy]

Originally posted by pepsi@Aug 30 2004, 03:21 AM
I would say 7 sometimes 8 or 9. A guy for each hand for her to stroke it off, a guy to fuck her mouth maybe 2, a guy to fuck her in her pussy hmm again maybe 2 if shes that loose, a guy to fuck her in the ass and 2 guys to be sucking on her tits.

[snapback]66790[/snapback]

LOL that was fun when we use to do that i had lots of fun but hmm i dont want to have three any mor because that made me sore and stincky for like 3 days LOL and i didnt like that and then it would be ok

[NinjaBassist]

I refuse to give credit for the two guys on the tits. Maybe one titty fuckin her. So I'll up it to 7

[TomFoolery]

bump

[TomFoolery]

Yeah, my mind is seriously fucked.

[pepsi]

Im waiting for a decent topic to debate about. Banana and Tom inspired me to start this thread to test my intelligence, but i dont see them saying shit. Fucken scared ass bitches.

[TomFoolery]

Originally posted by pepsi@Aug 30 2004, 11:46 PM
Im waiting for a decent topic to debate about. Banana and Tom inspired me to start this thread to test my intelligence, but i dont see them saying shit.  Fucken scared ass bitches.

[snapback]67240[/snapback]

:roll:

OK, we'll start with an easy one. Please tell me your views on capital punishment (the death penalty): pro or con? Please state argument(s) here. Thanks.

[pepsi]

Originally posted by Tom Foolery@Aug 30 2004, 11:48 PM
:roll: 

OK, we'll start with an easy one.  Please tell me your views on capital punishment (the death penalty): pro or con?  Please state argument(s) here.  Thanks.

[snapback]67241[/snapback]

Easy one like you said Tom. I am not against it I believe it is a good thing, because it shows to others if you do a crime you will face the ultimate punishment. If capital punishment was actually used more often the crime rate will go down and the streets would be safer to live on. The jails wont be over populated like they are now. People who have to serve long terms in jail actually will have to serve them, rather then letting a criminal out into the streets early. Taking the chances that they have learned their lesson and wont do the same things over. I can go on and on about this but my time is limited so i stated the main views i have on this.

[pepsi]

Ill continue this later Tom i need to go and wash my car before my usher concert. Be back later to respond to whatever else you may have to say about this.

[TomFoolery]

Originally posted by pepsi@Aug 31 2004, 12:02 AM
Easy one like you said Tom. I am not against it I believe it is a good thing, because it shows to others if you do a crime you will face the ultimate punishment. If capital punishment was actually used more often the crime rate will go down and the streets would be safer to live on. The jails wont be over populated like they are now. People who have to serve long terms in jail actually will have to serve them, rather then letting a criminal out into the streets early. Taking the chances that they have learned their lesson and wont do the same things over. I can go on and on about this but my time is limited so i stated the main views i have on this.

[snapback]67245[/snapback]

I'd like to hear your views on why it is OK for a judge and jury to decide the fate of another person...why allow them to "Play God"? What about states that already have the death penalty in place--do you have any evidence that supports capital punishment is actually a deterrent?

You didn't debate--you only shared your views. If you seriously want to debate I want facts, opinions from experts, and a solid foundation before I get more invovled. I don't think you're capable of meeting those requirements, so this thread will probably join the other shit SnD threads in the IT gutter.

[leucetios]

Originally posted by pepsi@Aug 30 2004, 03:02 PM
Easy one like you said Tom. I am not against it I believe it is a good thing, because it shows to others if you do a crime you will face the ultimate punishment. If capital punishment was actually used more often the crime rate will go down and the streets would be safer to live on. The jails wont be over populated like they are now. People who have to serve long terms in jail actually will have to serve them, rather then letting a criminal out into the streets early. Taking the chances that they have learned their lesson and wont do the same things over. I can go on and on about this but my time is limited so i stated the main views i have on this.

[snapback]67245[/snapback]

what about the people who go to prison but are found innocent years later? Acceptable losses?

[TomFoolery]

Originally posted by leucetios@Aug 31 2004, 12:09 AM
what about the people who go to prison but are found innocent years later?  Acceptable losses?

[snapback]67250[/snapback]

Good point. Do you have any idea how much it costs if you're going to use DNA testing to prove a murder? Explain an alternative to DNA testing that could prove beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of a murderer.

[pepsi]

Originally posted by leucetios@Aug 31 2004, 12:09 AM
what about the people who go to prison but are found innocent years later?  Acceptable losses?

[snapback]67250[/snapback]

Not acceptable but they will be paid for their losses.

[pepsi]

Originally posted by Tom Foolery@Aug 31 2004, 12:17 AM
Good point.  Do you have any idea how much it costs if you're going to use DNA testing to prove a murder?  Explain an alternative to DNA testing that could prove beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of a murderer.

[snapback]67251[/snapback]

Thats what the court systems are for.