Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Gulf Oil Leak
#21

Flumper Barflusterbutt Wrote:are you serious? That wouldn't be hard at all. I don't know what kind of pressure that oil is coming out of that pipe with, but plugging it or sleeving onto it would be simple on dry land. Granted being underwater makes it more difficult. But come on. That "top hat" concrete cap idea should have worked. I know that had it ready to put on and last I heard they said the "seas were too rough" to do it. Fuck that. Let those fucking crab fishermen from the north sea take it out there. They aren't scared to work in some rough water. Its been a fucking month now. Seriously.

Depending on the pressure it can be hard.

I think this is the spill 8 was referring to.It only took 8 months to cap it!

Divers were eventually able to reach and activate the BOP, but the pressure of the oil and gas caused the valves to begin rupturing. The BOP was reopened to prevent destroying it. Two relief wells were drilled to relieve pressure from the well to allow response personnel to cap it. Norwegian experts were contracted to bring in skimming equipment and containment booms, and to begin cleanup of the spilled oil. The IXTOC I well continued to spill oil at a rate of 10,000 - 30,000 barrels per day until it was finally capped on March 23, 1980.

http://www.incidentnews.gov/incident/6250

See You In Toledo
Reply
#22

You guys keep referring to the depth as being 2000 feet. The ruptured pipe is over twice that depth at 5000 feet.
Reply
#23

A stickler for details.

See You In Toledo
Reply
#24

It's Bush's fault -- I'm sure of it.
Reply
#25

squirt Wrote:It's Bush's fault -- I'm sure of it.

Was it a good idea for Cheyney to create energy policy with ceo's of oil companies behind closed doors?I bet those guys are real hard on regulating themselves.

See You In Toledo
Reply
#26

I got it covered.

[Image: blamebush.gif]
Reply
#27

justintime Wrote:You guys keep referring to the depth as being 2000 feet. The ruptured pipe is over twice that depth at 5000 feet.

yeah you are right. i just read its 50 miles off shore and about a mile deep. but still, that doesn't change the fact that the process to cap it would be the same.
Reply
#28

I blame Bush for Bird.

BIRD33 Wrote:Thats hilarious.No need for banning.You'll slowly realize the ass kicking you take here isnt worth it and will slink off only to return as a guest.Happens all the time.Enjoy your brief stay.
Reply
#29

squirt Wrote:I got it covered.

[Image: blamebush.gif]

That picture is a great substitute for valid arguments.Sums you up pretty good too."Pictures funny, me no need facts".

See You In Toledo
Reply
#30

Flumper Barflusterbutt Wrote:yeah you are right. i just read its 50 miles off shore and about a mile deep. but still, that doesn't change the fact that the process to cap it would be the same.

It does a little.I don't think we have subs capable of doing repairs like that at those depths.

See You In Toledo
Reply
#31

I think there is too much red tape. In Iraq we just shot missles to close up the pipes. No way we let anyone bomb the bottom of the ocean without an extensive study of what it would do to what or who....
Reply
#32

Anhil8tor Wrote:I think there is too much red tape. In Iraq we just shot missles to close up the pipes. No way we let anyone bomb the bottom of the ocean without an extensive study of what it would do to what or who....

I'm sure you arent serious.

See You In Toledo
Reply
#33

dead serious. Russia woulda dropped a nuke down there the first day. No more oil spewing out.
Reply
#34

Yeah, I think that blowing up the leak might be a solution. at least a temporary one until they can drill a new well to relieve the pressure.
Reply
#35

I know squat about politics down there by choice, but I've gotta ask how Haliburton can still be in business when they've been involved in so many epic fails.

[URL="http://www.gifsoup.com/view/471050/slap.html"][Image: sig_banner6.php?name=108]
[/URL]
Reply
#36

actually BP has killed more people than halliburton.
Reply
#37

Anhil8tor Wrote:actually BP has killed more people than halliburton.

well, BP or not, this is making your whole fucking state look pretty stupid that they don't take the bull by the horns and shut that fucking pipe down. I'm getting tired of you guys standing around bitching and waiting on handouts rather than getting something done about it.
Reply
#38

Its Obama's fault, guy.

See You In Toledo
Reply
#39

I agree. Blanco did nothing. Now Jindal seems to be waiting. I'm not sure what red tape is involved but it seems like at some point he'd say "You know what... fuck it. We are going to do whats right for us"

They better get that shit shut off before we have a hurricane.
Reply
#40

Father Juan Wrote:I know squat about politics down there by choice, but I've gotta ask how Haliburton can still be in business when they've been involved in so many epic fails.


the same way they got all the contracts without bidding
those fucks should be lined up and shot

I realise that I have a past to break with--an accumulation of inertia, wrong, foolishness, rot, junk.  A great need of clarification, of mindfulness, or rather, of no mind.  A need to return to genuine practice, right effort.  Need to push on the great doubt.  Need for the spirit.  Hang on to the clear light.
           
Thomas Merton


       
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)