[BIRD33]

I'm no pollster but isn't the "too harsh" option basically an admission by some people that a penalty was deserved for becketts actions but it was to much of a penalty?Thats not saying he was in the right, they just disagree with the length of the penalty.If you figured half of the 49% "too harsh" voters would have voted "ridiculous, he was not at fault" and the other half voted "penalty was needed but it was too harsh" thats still a majority of voters saying he was in the wrong for an incident he wasnt even thrown out of the game for.

35% thought the penalty was "just right" and 16% thought it "not enough" so you have an automatic 51% who think Beckett was the asshole here.Even if you only give 10% of the "too harsh" column to the anti beckett crowd thats still a 61% majority who think exactly the opposite of what you thought the poll results showed.Map blue, me must be right.



Translastion:"I'm wicked smaht".