03-19-2009, 04:12 PM
Cucumber Wrote:I'm ready to come down from my pedestal if you are willing to agree that we were are talking about is flawed methodolgy used in the initial studies in Africa and acknowledge that the studies have been done on AA and Latinos only.
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk...5120071204
Another one. This same article references three studies that reject male circumcision as a control method for HIV infection
http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/
Most relevant data is at the bottom.
There was also an article I found that compared the potential benefit with the numbers that would be required to achieve that. It was something like 1200 circumcisions would need to take place to possibily prevent one case of HIV infection. I'll try to find that too.
If you can show me how this study is more valid then the Johns Hopkins one I cited that would be helpful.Otherwise I'll stick with my position.
The CIRP website is totally biased.Its not a source its more like propaganda.
See You In Toledo

