[Anhil8tor]

What are your thoughts on both. I have heard from both sides that there are pros and cons.

[Banana]

Well, tubal ligation is considered day surgery performed in the hospital, carries more risks (primarily because it is done under general anesthetic), takes recovery time of one week, and is not reversible without considerable difficulty.

Vasectomy is done in the doctor's office in 30 minutes, carries very few risks relative to tubal ligation (because it is preformed under local anesthetic), takes recovery of 48 hours, and is easily reversible.

[squirt]

I had my tubes tied, and other than the fact I can never have kids again, I see no cons.

[Anhil8tor]

and those are your thoughts?


Thanks!

[squirt]

and those are your thoughts?


Thanks!

Yes. I am not male, so I can't speak for vasectomies.

The only thing I'd say is to be sure it's something you (or she) wants. Reversal is costly and not always 100%.

[Jimmy]

Post your boobs.

[squirt]

That only works for CT.

[Pickle]

Vasectomy just makes more sense. It's easier, quicker and requires less downtime. And can be kept more private. Have it done on a friday, stay home for the weekend - no one needs to know, if that's an issue.

Plus, what other procedure can you have done where afterwards you're told you HAVE to have sex or play with yourself so many times in a certain time span??

[Jimmy]

What's a CT?

[Flumper Barflusterbutt]

Plus, what other procedure can you have done where afterwards you're told you HAVE to have sex or play with yourself so many times in a certain time span??

Going to Minorthreats house to watch football?

[Banana]

Going to Minorthreats house to watch football?

That invovles some anal penetration. It's a bonus.

[BIRD33]

Of course a vasectomy makes more sense to women.You don't have a penis.

I'm shocked the guardian of the foreskin twins are so willing to go willy nilly on someones phallus.

[Banana]

Of course a vasectomy makes more sense to women.You don't have a penis.

I'm shocked the guardian of the foreskin twins are so willing to go willy nilly on someones phallus.

Why don't you get off your high horse someday?

I'm talking of facts, not personal opinions, the latter of which I haven't actually stated. But, let's continue to ignore what I say in favour of what you would like to attribute to me, naturally. Why change now?

Risks associated with circumcision are lower than risks associated with leaving intact. (I've cited these facts)

Risks associated with vasectomy are higher than risks associated with tubal ligation. (need these to be cited too?)

Please don't forget to ignore facts on your way to the delusional road of moral superiority. Let's also please acknowedge that a grown man is in charge of what happens to his penis. A baby is not.

[Pickle]

Because it's a decision a man can make for himself.

If it comes down to it, I'll get my tubes tied. I just think considering risks, down time, financial reasons - a vasectomy makes more sense. If hot dog refuses later down the line to have it done, I'll get tied.

[Pickle]

Why don't you get off your high horse someday?



Risks associated with vasectomy are lower than risks associated with tubal ligation. (need these to be cited too?)

Fixed.

[Jimmy]

oops?

FOOOK How do I multiquote???

Anyway, Cucumber contradicted herself.

[Jimmy]

Fukk off Picklehed

[Banana]

Fixed.

Thank you.

[Banana]

There's always a solution that most couples aren't willing to consider. Neither. I won't ask Jimmy to get a vasectomy and I doubt he'll suggest I get a tubal.

[Jimmy]