01-23-2007, 05:17 PM
The strong implication of the most recent item on ESPN.com regarding the decision of Miami authorities not to pursue charges against Falcons running back Michael Vick is that Vick had in his possession a bottle containing a secret compartment.
So what the hell was supposed to be in there, if not marijuana or some other contraband? Breath mints? Chewing tobacco?
Valtrex?
In our view, the fact that tests on the substance found in the secret compartment didn't lead to a conclusion that it was marijuana rehabilitates Vick's sinking image only among those members of the population who have no common sense.
As one reader astutely pointed out, Vick being caught in an airport with a bottle containing a secret compartment is no different than Onterrio Smith being found with a Whizzinator. Smith had no drugs on him, but it was obvious that the, um, device was aimed at concealing his marijuana habit.
And keep in mind the fact that the NFL's substance abuse policy can trigger scrutiny based solely on behavior, not a positive test. So if Vick isn't already in the program, he very well could be based on last week's events.
So what the hell was supposed to be in there, if not marijuana or some other contraband? Breath mints? Chewing tobacco?
Valtrex?
In our view, the fact that tests on the substance found in the secret compartment didn't lead to a conclusion that it was marijuana rehabilitates Vick's sinking image only among those members of the population who have no common sense.
As one reader astutely pointed out, Vick being caught in an airport with a bottle containing a secret compartment is no different than Onterrio Smith being found with a Whizzinator. Smith had no drugs on him, but it was obvious that the, um, device was aimed at concealing his marijuana habit.
And keep in mind the fact that the NFL's substance abuse policy can trigger scrutiny based solely on behavior, not a positive test. So if Vick isn't already in the program, he very well could be based on last week's events.

