01-20-2010, 07:16 PM
Banana Wrote:My MIL works at the daycare. Best of both worlds
except you don't get one on one care totally.
Banana Wrote:My MIL works at the daycare. Best of both worlds
bam Wrote:My mother-in-law watches my kids too, but we do pay her. When my daughter was in NICU and I got stuck with $100K in medical debt I didn't get any help. I was told I make too much money. When I enrolled in college and went to apply for financial aid, they basically laughed me out the door. Granted, I was able to get loans, but grants? Forget it. My financial aid person actually told me that the only way I'd be able to get assistance is if I had a child out of wedlock and went to a lower paying job. (I only made $10/hour then.) How does that encourage people to do better? I'm not sure. I know that I was infuriated though. I worked full time and went to school full time, all on my own dime. I maintained a 4.0 GPA throughout my college career and I can't get any assistance? What's messed up is when you go to class, work your ass off and then you have some slacker that shows up to class every 3 days just so they can collect their tuition check. So in my opinion is the system abused? Absolutely. Don't get me wrong, if people need help, I'm fine with that, but fuck giving them money and not demanding that they better themselves. What's that saying? Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime. I personally think it's time we stop "giving" and start "teaching."Very, very well said.
littlelolly Wrote:You asked me a question about my personal life, so I answered.
So wait...poor people and their children from broken homes are allowed to be lazy for years on end and drain the system? It shouldn't work that way. They're given the assistance to help get them out of their current situation--not to keep them in it. Instead, they've chosen to stay sucking on the government's teat because it's easier--and why should they have to assume any responsibility when they've had a hard life? This is what liberals want them to do. Poor, poor victims. Here. I'll take care of you. Just vote the way I want you to when the elections come 'round, okay?
bam Wrote:My folks, my boyfriend, his parents- they're all Republicans and I still like them. My grandparents are Democrats and believe it or not, I still like them. We just don't ever talk about politics.
bam Wrote:That's exactly what I'm talking about. You are being responsible for yourself and your family and aren't expecting any handouts. Kudos to you!
littlelolly Wrote:'Scuse me, but I get a nervous tic when people say things like this. Mom had an old back injury. Wasn't so bad she couldn't lay on it and put her legs up in the air without contraception in place. Her choice. Dad decided to become an alcoholic? His choice--and the great thing about AA is that they have meetings 24 hours a day, so use another excuse--er, I mean, example. Has a criminal record? He made a choice to break the law. His decisions and lack of responsibility are now the problems of the taxpaying society? He also made the choice to put himself and his children into a situation they couldn't handle. Should those kids starve? No. But should we have to carry the burden of raising his family forever? No. Excuses only work for so long. I think JCW is right when she talks about better safety nets and whatnot. Forward progress needs to be made or we're doing everyone a serious disservice.
BIRD33 Wrote:You're a republican just so you know.
BIRD33 Wrote:says the person who has a job due to the auto bailout.
bam Wrote:Nope, Libertarian. We believe in personal responsibility.You are the only libertarian that believes in torture.How does individual rights square with pulling the fingernails off a person who was never convicted of anything?You are a conservative who believes in less government, torture and less taxes.Thats a republican.Most likely you are kind of embarrassed to call yourself that because of the last administration.
bam Wrote:Nope. Actually, 90% of our business is Nissan and Toyota. And my company is financially stable enough to take a hit if GM went under. GM has no sympathy from me.
Anhil8tor Wrote:except you don't get one on one care totally.
BIRD33 Wrote:You are the only libertarian that believes in torture.How does individual rights square with pulling the fingernails off a person who was never convicted of anything?You are a conservative who believes in less government, torture and less taxes.Thats a republican.Most likely you are kind of embarrassed to call yourself that because of the last administration.
BIRD33 Wrote:say GM goes out of business and all their workers get laid off so there is a huge amount of available labor skilled in the same thing you do.Do your salaries rise or fall based on that?Don't kid yourself you havent benefited from that bail out.
bam Wrote:Most people don't share all of the same views as their political party. I am no exception. I believe in torturing terrorists to get the information we need to protect our country. They do it to us. So if some uses of water boarding and other forms of torture yielded valuable information that might be used to rescue innocent victims of terrorists, there would be no basis to object to it.
No, I'm not embarassed of the last administration nor am I embarassed of the current administration. Both have done things I don't agree with. But embarassed of any administration? No because that would mean (to me) that I was embarassed to be an American and that will never happen.
BIRD33 Wrote:Insane.How many "git er done" T-shirts do you own?
Beau Wrote:Just 1 but it's getting old. Been lookin fer another good ern here lately. :d