Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

a lot of consumer confusion about HDTV
#1

lifted from nytimes:


So here’s a paraphrased version of what I learned or confirmed from him. If you’re among the HDTV shoppers who have yet to buy your set for the big game, maybe the advice here will help you out.

Q: Is there a lot of consumer confusion about HDTV?

A: Oh, man, you have no idea. People come in here absolutely clueless. Or furious, because they bought an HDTV set, got it home, and discovered that the picture doesn’t look anything like it did here in the store. Because they don’t realize they need a high-def *signal* to feed that set. For example, they need to replace their cable boxes with digital ones, or put a high-def antenna on the roof.

[D.P. adds: According to a study by the Leichtman Research Group, 50 percent of HDTV owners aren’t actually watching any high-def shows on them... but 25 percent of them *think* they are.]

Q: Isn’t it true, in fact, that standard-def broadcasts actually look *worse* on a high-def TV?

A: Unfortunately, yes.

Q: Don’t you guys deliberately put the store-display screens in “torch mode,” cranking the brightness and contrast all the way up to catch shoppers’ eyes?

A: We don’t adjust the sets to look that way; that’s the way most sets come from the factory. It actually makes the set look a lot worse than it will when you get it home and get it properly calibrated.

Q: Oh, you have to pay someone to come over and tweak the set?

A: You really should. We offer that service as part of installation.

[D.P. adds: How did I know he was going to say that?]

Q: O.K., here we go. One-word answer: plasma or LCD?

A: They both offer an amazing picture these days. In the better sets, the traditional flaws of plasma (like burn-in) and LCD (limited viewing angle, not very deep blacks, weak fast motion) have been largely eliminated.

The plasma screens still have glossy surfaces, though, and LCD sets are still brighter. So as a rough guideline, plasma has truer color and does better in darker rooms, and LCD has more vivid color and does better in bright rooms. (LCD is also lighter and more energy-efficient, but usually costs more for the same-size set.)

Q: OK, how about this one: 720p or 1080p?

A: These are measurements of how many fine lines make up the picture.

You’d think that 1080p is obviously better than 720p. Trouble is, you won’t get a 1080p image unless you feed it a 1080p signal — and that’s hard to come by. There’s no such thing as a 1080p TV broadcast (cable, satellite, anything), and won’t be for years. Even most games, like Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, generally send out 720p (or less).

So the *only* way to get a 1080p picture on a 1080p set is to buy a high-def DVD player (Blu-ray or HD DVD). That’s the only way. *** Xbox????

[D.P. adds: Even then, you won’t see any difference between 720p and 1080p unless you sit closer than 10 feet from the TV and it’s bigger than 55 inches or so.

And even then, you’re not getting any additional sharpness or detail. Instead, as CNET notes, you’re just gaining the ability to move closer without seeing individual pixels: “In other words, you can sit closer to a 1080p television and not notice any pixel structure, such as stair-stepping along diagonal lines, or the screen door effect (where you can actually see the space between the pixels).”]

Q: But a 1080p set costs a lot more than an identical 720p set, doesn’t it?

A: Yeah.

[D.P. adds: At this point, he showed me two plasmas, same brand, same size, same model line, mounted one above the other: one 720p, the other 1080p. The fancier set cost $2,000 more — and the image quality was pixel-for-pixel identical.]

Q: What’s the best-selling size?

A: It used to be 42 inches. Nowadays, 50-inchers are more common, and even larger, because prices have dropped so much.

Q: Is a bigger screen always better?

A: Depends on whether you ask the husband or the wife.

If you sit 8 to 10 feet back, a 50- or 60-incher is not too big. But you don’t want to overpower the room. If the screen dominates the room, it almost discourages relaxing, because it just towers over the space.

Q: What about rear-projection sets?

A: They’re great. And they’re often overlooked, because flat panels are all the rage. But the truth is, once you mount a flat-panel TV, it’s just as thick as today’s rear-projection sets (several inches from the wall).

Meanwhile, the quality of the rear-projection sets is amazing; it’s been improving every year. The downside is that you can’t sit as far off-angle as you can with a flat panel. But rear-projection sets offer the biggest size at the best price. And they weigh almost nothing. One person can lift one.

[DP adds: Except you do have to replace the bulb every few years, which can cost several hundred dollars.]

Q: How come you guys don’t have the remote controls on display?

A: We don’t like to put them on display, because every time I turn around, somebody’s turned a bunch of the TVs off.

Q: So of all the sets here, which is the very best one to buy for the Super Bowl?

A: Well, all of them will give you an absolutely great picture. But there’s one thing that none of these sets can do: they can’t make the Giants look good.

I realise that I have a past to break with--an accumulation of inertia, wrong, foolishness, rot, junk.  A great need of clarification, of mindfulness, or rather, of no mind.  A need to return to genuine practice, right effort.  Need to push on the great doubt.  Need for the spirit.  Hang on to the clear light.
           
Thomas Merton


       
Reply
#2

snarg Wrote:Q: What about rear-projection sets?

A: They’re great. And they’re often overlooked, because flat panels are all the rage. But the truth is, once you mount a flat-panel TV, it’s just as thick as today’s rear-projection sets (several inches from the wall).

No shit? I have a several year old 65" Rear Projection in the den and I hate it because its so deep. No way to place it in the room. If you put it against the wall, the screen is nearly 2 feet out from the wall. I call bullshit on this.

But the picture is great.
Reply
#3

it is several years old
this article is from today
do the math, einstein

I realise that I have a past to break with--an accumulation of inertia, wrong, foolishness, rot, junk.  A great need of clarification, of mindfulness, or rather, of no mind.  A need to return to genuine practice, right effort.  Need to push on the great doubt.  Need for the spirit.  Hang on to the clear light.
           
Thomas Merton


       
Reply
#4

snarg Wrote:it is several years old
this article is from today
do the math, einstein

Well, just knowing how a rear projection works, they have to be pretty fucking deep for them to work. The flat screens are thin as shit. No way they take up the same room when mounted.
Reply
#5

recently got a 50" plasma. i don't have cable, satellite or anything fancy like that. I'm picking up high def signals with rabbit ears. and there are at least one or two stations that broadcast at 1080

ntype Wrote:unrack me it's another false friend. mmh you were "readjusted" but I suppose that google translation is another source of bizzareness in one of my posts.

I fear that.
Reply
#6

Shadrach Wrote:and there are at least one or two stations that broadcast at 1080

So much for the "state of the art" knowledge in that interview.
Reply
#7

Consumers are dumb, and by consumers I mean you.

cLaY Wrote:Knick-Knack Paddy's Whack, suckin' TF's Bone...

BIRD33 Wrote:You know who would be hilarious in a thread with this type of situation going on?Paddy.

BIRD33 Wrote:I was battling with the mods just like everyone else.
Reply
#8

Flumper Barflusterbutt Wrote:Well, just knowing how a rear projection works, they have to be pretty fucking deep for them to work. The flat screens are thin as shit. No way they take up the same room when mounted.

you dint read it, did ya??
and paddy is correct in his assessment
you and gwb should both improve america by leaving the county:fuckYou:

I realise that I have a past to break with--an accumulation of inertia, wrong, foolishness, rot, junk.  A great need of clarification, of mindfulness, or rather, of no mind.  A need to return to genuine practice, right effort.  Need to push on the great doubt.  Need for the spirit.  Hang on to the clear light.
           
Thomas Merton


       
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
Last Post by ncbiker
07-30-2014, 06:32 PM
Last Post by Sassy
08-28-2008, 07:53 PM
Last Post by ntype
05-09-2008, 05:37 PM
Last Post by Oli-dogg
02-07-2006, 02:14 PM
Last Post by Pong
01-24-2006, 10:32 AM
Last Post by Bill
01-12-2006, 05:16 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)