01-28-2005, 04:45 AM
No, I didn't spam or flood or flame or smack or anything. I just lurked and read the TF thread. All I have to say is...........LFC, I guarantee your days are numbered there. Good Luck.
So I was just at UJ
01-28-2005, 04:46 AM
minorthreat Wrote:No, I didn't spam or flood or flame or smack or anything. I just lurked and read the TF thread. All I have to say is...........LFC, I guarantee your days are numbered there. Good Luck.
2nd.
01-28-2005, 04:47 AM
I like LFC...
ITers are slim pickens over there lately
ITers are slim pickens over there lately
01-28-2005, 04:47 AM
I didn't attack a mod. i said one (ok, 5) thing. I just don't want some dumb fuck (sup NCscott) calling me a card-carrying IT cork soaker. I'm not.
01-28-2005, 04:50 AM
LFC Wrote:I didn't attack a mod. i said one (ok, 5) thing. I just don't want some dumb fuck (sup NCscott) calling me a card-carrying IT cork soaker. I'm not.
Sorry dood, you broke rule #2 at UJ. Which states: No member of this forum shall disagree with a respected senior member no matter how much they and everyone else knows they are right.
That's right behind #1 about disagreeing with a mod.
01-28-2005, 04:50 AM
LFC Wrote:I didn't attack a mod. i said one (ok, 5) thing. I just don't want some dumb fuck (sup NCscott) calling me a card-carrying IT cork soaker. I'm not.
that's cause we don't have cards, yet
01-28-2005, 04:52 AM
LFC Wrote:I didn't attack a mod. i said one (ok, 5) thing. I just don't want some dumb fuck (sup NCscott) calling me a card-carrying IT cork soaker. I'm not.
but ya will be soon
so get used to it, sucka
narg:
I realise that I have a past to break with--an accumulation of inertia, wrong, foolishness, rot, junk. A great need of clarification, of mindfulness, or rather, of no mind. A need to return to genuine practice, right effort. Need to push on the great doubt. Need for the spirit. Hang on to the clear light.
Thomas Merton
![[Image: boston.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/FattyJ16/boston.jpg)
01-28-2005, 04:55 AM
not nessacelery.
From their rules... (AHEM)
"Threats to attack UJ
Any threat to attack UJ will get you banned. Even if you make a threat on another site and comment about a planned attack, you will be banned without question. This includes email threats, IM threats, IRC threats, or verbal threats. (This will apply to true server hacking or troll-floods or any other act of malice).
edited January 25, 2005
From their rules... (AHEM)
"Threats to attack UJ
Any threat to attack UJ will get you banned. Even if you make a threat on another site and comment about a planned attack, you will be banned without question. This includes email threats, IM threats, IRC threats, or verbal threats. (This will apply to true server hacking or troll-floods or any other act of malice).
edited January 25, 2005
01-28-2005, 04:56 AM
WoolyGoat Wrote:ncscott...dude sucks...sup brotha?
That's the funny thing. I honestly never knew who he was until he came here and talked shit to me once. I guess it was kick your own ass day.
01-28-2005, 04:57 AM
LFC Wrote:not nessacelery.
From their rules... (AHEM)
"Threats to attack UJ
Any threat to attack UJ will get you banned. Even if you make a threat on another site and comment about a planned attack, you will be banned without question. This includes email threats, IM threats, IRC threats, or verbal threats. (This will apply to true server hacking or troll-floods or any other act of malice).
edited January 25, 2005
Keep praying for the loophole dawg.........welcome to IT.
01-28-2005, 04:59 AM
WoolyGoat Wrote:lol, and you bumped a few old threads ('sup CT?)I'm afraid newbs are gonna vote and Tom will lose now :roll:
01-28-2005, 05:00 AM
minorthreat Wrote:Keep praying for the loophole dawg.........welcome to IT.
I've exploited the loophole before. It led to a revision of rules.
I'm like Pete Rose; I make you change the way you play the game but still compile the hits, and because of a little controversy I get a lifetime ban.
BIRD33 Wrote:Im guessing BEW's vag loks like a hotdog that exploded in the microwave.
01-28-2005, 05:00 AM
LFC Wrote:not nessacelery.
From their rules... (AHEM)
"Threats to attack UJ
Any threat to attack UJ will get you banned. Even if you make a threat on another site and comment about a planned attack, you will be banned without question. This includes email threats, IM threats, IRC threats, or verbal threats. (This will apply to true server hacking or troll-floods or any other act of malice).
edited January 25, 2005
they don't give a fuck about rules
just use em when convenient
i got banned for bein a bdic trool, i did not even know bdic at the time
and yada yada yada
you will be banned and whine and get over it
or not
welcome to IT, brotha, yer toast over there
narg:
I realise that I have a past to break with--an accumulation of inertia, wrong, foolishness, rot, junk. A great need of clarification, of mindfulness, or rather, of no mind. A need to return to genuine practice, right effort. Need to push on the great doubt. Need for the spirit. Hang on to the clear light.
Thomas Merton
01-28-2005, 05:01 AM
WoolyGoat Wrote:lol, and you bumped a few old threads ('sup CT?)
Yep. I'm not saying you will be banned right away, but you are marked now. I can bet that they would have found a reason to get rid of Tom anyway. We have people here that have posted once at UJ and got banned because they thought they were one of us. You shouldn't even be posting here, you are in danger.
01-28-2005, 05:03 AM
TomFoolery Wrote:I've exploited the loophole before. It led to a revision of rules.
I'm like Pete Rose; I make you change the way you play the game but still compile the hits, and because of a little controversy I get a lifetime ban.
all i can say is they made another error
a very big one this time
i trust you can live with it or you would not have acted as you did
all the better for us if it means you will be here more
i hope your humbling is not in vain, we love you, but not in a ghey way, of course
narg:
I realise that I have a past to break with--an accumulation of inertia, wrong, foolishness, rot, junk. A great need of clarification, of mindfulness, or rather, of no mind. A need to return to genuine practice, right effort. Need to push on the great doubt. Need for the spirit. Hang on to the clear light.
Thomas Merton
01-28-2005, 05:11 AM
vbookie thread.....
how many mods are viewing this thread right now?
how many mods are viewing this thread right now?
01-28-2005, 05:15 AM
minorthreat Wrote:That's the funny thing. I honestly never knew who he was until he came here and talked shit to me once. I guess it was kick your own ass day.That guy's a phag.
NCScott
Son, I am Disappoint.
01-28-2005, 05:20 AM
Even though he's been busting my balls recently I think ncscott is a good shit.
BIRD33 Wrote:Im guessing BEW's vag loks like a hotdog that exploded in the microwave.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)