[Undeadcannibal]

Eh, shit happens. make a paypal thing and forget about it,

[cLaY]

Agreed. Costing the website and extra $230.00 buck a month is ridiculous. You hit the nail right on the head with that. :d

That's not the issue I'm speaking of grumpy ass. He was fucking around, do you really think his intent was to fuck the entire site up? Hell no...why punish him?

[snarg]

i will get a paypal acct for this
after resisting one till now
i don't have a lot but if a few of us can send something, can't hurt

narg:

[Undeadcannibal]

yeah, I've got a spare 10 bucks.

[Banana]

That's not the issue I'm speaking of grumpy ass. He was fucking around, do you really think his intent was to fuck the entire site up? Hell no...why punish him?

Is he being punished?

[leucetios]

That's not the issue I'm speaking of grumpy ass. He was fucking around, do you really think his intent was to fuck the entire site up? Hell no...why punish him?

Question: What did Tom possibly think would happen with his little posts?

Let's play it out:

1. Nothing. The site would handle it, there would be a thread with "TomFoolery" in it shitload of times and no one would care, no one would rack him, it would die a lonely ignored thread.

2. It would be called Spam and get deleted, or moved, or something, giving bdic and all of you who enjoy ranting and stomping your feet more fodder for "this place is no different" threads. Tom might get racked.

3. It would break the site. This would definately get some kind of rise out of the owners of the site. Possibly a banning? Stripping him of mod powers? Something to allow the effect of number 2 to happen. Tom would more than likely get racked.

It seems like there's no way he could have had truly innocuous intentions. So why punish him? Well, its not punishment. If you want to fuck around you're welcome to do so (with reason, and taking down 400 sites is not within reason), but you won't be a mod. Its just stupid to have people you can't trust (sup VitE) and who might do idiotic things (sup Tom) as Mods.

[cLaY]

Is he being punished?

Well, he's being punished by all the talk of how he fucked up the site for Lee, and how much its gonna cost him. Any one of us could have tried doing what Tom did...

[bdic]

Is he being punished?

Well, he's being punished by all the talk of how he fucked up the site for Lee, and how much its gonna cost him. Any one of us could have tried doing what Tom did...

How about that.
I see. being punished by all the talk of how he fucked up the site for Lee and how much its gonna cost him is
being punished by all the talk of how he fucked up the site for Lee and how much its gonna cost him
?Yes I think there are.

[Beaucephus]

Question: What did Tom possibly think would happen with his little posts?

Let's play it out:

1. Nothing. The site would handle it, there would be a thread with "TomFoolery" in it shitload of times and no one would care, no one would rack him, it would die a lonely ignore thread.

2. It would be called Spam and get deleted, or moved, or something, giving bdic and all of you who enjoy ranting and stomping your feet more fodder for "this place is no different" threads. Tom might get racked.

3. It would break the site. This would definately get some kind of rise out of the owners of the site. Possibly a banning? Stripping him of mod powers? Something to allow the effect of number 2 to happen. Tom would more than likely get racked.

It seems like there's no way he could have had truly innocuous intentions. So why punish him? Well, its not punishment. If you want to fuck around you're welcome to do so (with reason, and taking down 400 sites is not within reason), but you won't be a mod. Its just stupid to have people you can't trust (sup VitE) and who might do idiotic things (sup Tom) as Mods.

RACK! :d

[cLaY]

Question: What did Tom possibly think would happen with his little posts?

Let's play it out:

1. Nothing. The site would handle it, there would be a thread with "TomFoolery" in it shitload of times and no one would care, no one would rack him, it would die a lonely ignored thread.

2. It would be called Spam and get deleted, or moved, or something, giving bdic and all of you who enjoy ranting and stomping your feet more fodder for "this place is no different" threads. Tom might get racked.

3. It would break the site. This would definately get some kind of rise out of the owners of the site. Possibly a banning? Stripping him of mod powers? Something to allow the effect of number 2 to happen. Tom would more than likely get racked.

It seems like there's no way he could have had truly innocuous intentions. So why punish him? Well, its not punishment. If you want to fuck around you're welcome to do so (with reason, and taking down 400 sites is not within reason), but you won't be a mod. Its just stupid to have people you can't trust (sup VitE) and who might do idiotic things (sup Tom) as Mods.

Okay...so I ask you this...what about Velvet?

[Banana]

Well, he's being punished by all the talk of how he fucked up the site for Lee, and how much its gonna cost him. Any one of us could have tried doing what Tom did...

True. He is sorry. I know he didn't mean it. However, he shouldn't be praised either. Not pointing out anyone specifically, but it's not "rack-worthy."

[leucetios]

Well, he's being punished by all the talk of how he fucked up the site for Lee, and how much its gonna cost him. Any one of us could have tried doing what Tom did...

Anyone of us could have. But any one of us didn't. Welcome to the real world. He did a stupid thing, he cost Lee money, could have cost us all the site, cost 400 other sites uptime, which could possibly mean money for people making a livelyhood. Yes it is going to get talked about.

If you do a stupid thing and people talk about how totally fucking studid and inconsiderate you are, that's not punishment. Its a fact.

[Banana]

Okay...so I ask you this...what about Velvet?

Two COMPLETELY different situations, dood.

[leucetios]

Okay...so I ask you this...what about Velvet?

I'm sorry. I missed when velvet gave her login info to someone who had already had their admin powers removed, and took the site down along with 400 others. Could you go ahead and bump those threads for me?

[bdic]

Okay...so I ask you this...what about Velvet?

I'm sorry. I missed when velvet gave her login info to someone who had already had their admin powers removed, and took the site down along with 400 others. Could you go ahead and bump those threads for me?

Do you really mean it?Interesting gossip:
said missed when velvet gave her login info to someone who had already had their admin powers removed and took the site down along with 400 others.
I will consider

go ahead and bump those threads for him or her

.

[Undeadcannibal]

I'm sorry. I missed when velvet gave her login info to someone who had already had their admin powers removed, and took the site down along with 400 others. Could you go ahead and bump those threads for me?

DOUBLE RACK!

[minorthreat]

Put all the banners up you need I say. This place will still be heads above the other place.
I don't know what went on with Tom because I just got on but isn't there already one bdic? Just sayin'

[CT280]

i doubt dawg is going to get punished, and i'm just fucking jerking his chain. but if you think for one minute i won't run with this bitch for all its worth, you're wrong. someone please donate some points to me.

[cLaY]

1. agree...totally not rack worthy...

2. leu...i see your point, my apologies

3. IMO Velvet has done some idiotic things in the past that go against the site.

[bdic]

1. agree...totally not rack worthy...

2. leu...i see your point, my apologies

3. IMO Velvet has done some idiotic things in the past that go against the site.

Only one?A deeper algorithm is needed to respond to that correctly.
Really you don't think so? Dude!Are you still located in ?
How do you usually introduce yourself?
Where do you see your point his or her apologies3?Where did IMO Velvet get done some idiotic things in the past that go against the site?