08-24-2007, 03:29 PM
The tactic isn't surprising, since refusing to admit to killing a dog or to gambling on a dog fight will enhance Vick's ability to avoid Virginia charges and a lengthy NFL suspension.
As a result, we don't buy it. Why would Vick devote so much money to the pursuit of an illegal endeavor that is a conduit for gambling if he wasn't going to "make it interesting"? Otherwise, it's like playing poker for pistachio shells.
While we have tremendous respect for what the federal government has done in this case, and at the risk of getting "randomly" selected for an audit, why are prosecutors letting Vick's people dictate the terms of the statement of facts?
More specifically, why didn't the feds prepare the statement of facts when extending the plea offer and advise Vick that this is the document that he will sign if he accepts the plea?
Purnell Peace and Quanis Phillips admitted to killing eight dogs in April 2007, and they both said that Vick participated. For the feds to allow Vick to avoid this critical fact is, in our view, extremely unfair to the two guys who pleaded out before him. Especially since the statements of fact that they signed can now be used against them by prosecutors in Virginia.
We think that the federal prosecutors should give Vick two options: sign the same document that Peace and Phillips signed, or go to trial. Anything else will undermine the reputation that federal prosecutors currently enjoy.
Step 1 to playing in the NFL in 2009
As a result, we don't buy it. Why would Vick devote so much money to the pursuit of an illegal endeavor that is a conduit for gambling if he wasn't going to "make it interesting"? Otherwise, it's like playing poker for pistachio shells.
While we have tremendous respect for what the federal government has done in this case, and at the risk of getting "randomly" selected for an audit, why are prosecutors letting Vick's people dictate the terms of the statement of facts?
More specifically, why didn't the feds prepare the statement of facts when extending the plea offer and advise Vick that this is the document that he will sign if he accepts the plea?
Purnell Peace and Quanis Phillips admitted to killing eight dogs in April 2007, and they both said that Vick participated. For the feds to allow Vick to avoid this critical fact is, in our view, extremely unfair to the two guys who pleaded out before him. Especially since the statements of fact that they signed can now be used against them by prosecutors in Virginia.
We think that the federal prosecutors should give Vick two options: sign the same document that Peace and Phillips signed, or go to trial. Anything else will undermine the reputation that federal prosecutors currently enjoy.
Step 1 to playing in the NFL in 2009

