A political question. - Printable Version
+- InsaneTrain Forums (https://insanetrain.com)
+-- Forum: General (https://insanetrain.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: General Forum (https://insanetrain.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: A political question. (/showthread.php?tid=36904)
+- InsaneTrain Forums (https://insanetrain.com)
+-- Forum: General (https://insanetrain.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: General Forum (https://insanetrain.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: A political question. (/showthread.php?tid=36904)
A political question. - Bill - 06-08-2006
Will all the hype on the zarqawi death, it dawned on me.
If we are in Iraq because sadam had something to do with 911, Why is he just on trial for war crimes and not crimes against humanity?
A political question. - Michman - 06-08-2006
Shenanigans Wrote:Will all the hype on the zarqawi death, it dawned on me.
If we are in Iraq because sadam had something to do with 911, Why is he just on trial for war crimes and not crimes against humanity?
maybe if he is aquited they will go after that charge?
A political question. - Major Private - 06-08-2006
fuck it just kill his sorry ass by anal bleeding caused by hogs ass raping him
-fin
A political question. - ntype - 06-08-2006
Well you are in Irak because of his petrol not of Sadam's implication with "islamic terrorists " (btw Sadam was a dictator is whole purpose was to maintain is own power not to instantiate some kind of religious government where he wouldn't be welcome at the end).
mmh.
A political question. - Flumper Barflusterbutt - 06-08-2006
Shenanigans Wrote:Will all the hype on the zarqawi death, it dawned on me.
If we are in Iraq because sadam had something to do with 911, Why is he just on trial for war crimes and not crimes against humanity?
Let me give it to you in a nutshell.
Saddam invaded Kuwait and we went to defend them and get him out. Then Saddam signed a peace treaty and cease fire agreement. In that agreement, he agreed that if he did not cease fire and abide by the terms of that treaty, we could come into Iraq and fuck his shit up. He never complied with the terms of the treaty. Bush I did not have the balls or the backing to go in and take him out. Clinton did not have the balls or the backing to go in and do anything more than drop a bomb or two in his direction.
9-11 happened. Bin Laden, another dumbfuck muslim, decides that we are cowards and he threatens us on our own soil. Bush II cleans out Afghanistan, but fails to capture him. But, now the US people are sick of being fucked around by these towel heads. So, Bush II capitalizes on this new found desire to fuck up Islamic radicals and turns back to Saddam and says "Abide by that fucking treaty you signed, or I'm gonna do something about it". Saddam laughs at us. We took him out and now are letting his people put him on trial for all of the crimes he committed against them while he was in power.
Saddam didn't have anything to do with 9-11. It just gave us the balls to do what we should have done years ago.
A political question. - BIRD33 - 06-08-2006
Flumper Barflusterbutt Wrote:Let me give it to you in a nutshell.
Saddam invaded Kuwait and we went to defend them and get him out. Then Saddam signed a peace treaty and cease fire agreement. In that agreement, he agreed that if he did not cease fire and abide by the terms of that treaty, we could come into Iraq and fuck his shit up. He never complied with the terms of the treaty. Bush I did not have the balls or the backing to go in and take him out. Clinton did not have the balls or the backing to go in and do anything more than drop a bomb or two in his direction.
9-11 happened. Bin Laden, another dumbfuck muslim, decides that we are cowards and he threatens us on our own soil. Bush II cleans out Afghanistan, but fails to capture him. But, now the US people are sick of being fucked around by these towel heads. So, Bush II capitalizes on this new found desire to fuck up Islamic radicals and turns back to Saddam and says "Abide by that fucking treaty you signed, or I'm gonna do something about it". Saddam laughs at us. We took him out and now are letting his people put him on trial for all of the crimes he committed against them while he was in power.
Saddam didn't have anything to do with 9-11. It just gave us the balls to do what we should have done years ago.
Your rationalization is typical redneck limited world view logic based on nothing but how badass the USA is.Look where it got us.No one argues that it isnt a disaster but you still feel all tough sitting behind your computer huh?Over 2000 dead and at least 15 years to go.
A political question. - ClayRock - 06-08-2006
treaty or faulty intelligence saying he had WMD?
A political question. - Raiden - 06-08-2006
so where's all the free oil?
A political question. - Flumper Barflusterbutt - 06-08-2006
BIRD33 Wrote:Your rationalization is typical redneck limited world view logic based on nothing but how badass the USA is.Look where it got us.No one argues that it isnt a disaster but you still feel all tough sitting behind your computer huh?Over 2000 dead and at least 15 years to go.
BIRD33 Wrote:Chickenshit.
:lool:
A political question. - ClayRock - 06-08-2006
Raiden Wrote:so where's all the free oil?
would you kill yourself or at least think before you submit a reply? you tard up every thread you post in.
A political question. - BIRD33 - 06-08-2006
Raiden Wrote:so where's all the free oil?
exactly.Instead of cheap oil you get to foot the billion dollars a month bill we spend on some arab country that never attacked us.
A political question. - BIRD33 - 06-08-2006
Flumper Barflusterbutt Wrote::lool:
Two different topics but I enjoy your BEW knight in shining armor act.Once you get your toby keith talking points out you don't have much do you?
A political question. - Flumper Barflusterbutt - 06-08-2006
ClayRock Wrote:treaty or faulty intelligence saying he had WMD?
No doubt there was some faulty intelligence. No doubt about that. But, there were some flat out blatant violations of the terms of that treaty. The one he signed to keep us from marching into Baghdad at the end of the first gulf war. We let him off really easy at the end of that war.
A political question. - ClayRock - 06-08-2006
Flumper Barflusterbutt Wrote:No doubt there was some faulty intelligence. No doubt about that. But, there were some flat out blatant violations of the terms of that treaty. The one he signed to keep us from marching into Baghdad at the end of the first gulf war. We let him off really easy at the end of that war.
well when all teh talk was going around about the US going into Iraq, i can't remember "breach of treaty agreement" being one of the reasons, it was all about WMD this and that.
A political question. - Flumper Barflusterbutt - 06-08-2006
BIRD33 Wrote:Two different topics but I enjoy your BEW knight in shining armor act.Once you get your toby keith talking points out you don't have much do you?
Dude, you know you are just a political hater when you can't be proud of what happened today. Just for one day. The worst terrorist alive on this planet was killed last night by our troops. They found him and they killed him. The guy that beheaded those people and posted the videos on the internet where their families could see it, is no more. I don't give a shit what your political views are, today's a damn good day.
A political question. - Flumper Barflusterbutt - 06-08-2006
ClayRock Wrote:well when all teh talk was going around about the US going into Iraq, i can't remember "breach of treaty agreement" being one of the reasons, it was all about WMD this and that.
Um. No.
A political question. - TomFoolery - 06-08-2006
Don't use the term "towel heads" again. Thanks.
A political question. - BIRD33 - 06-08-2006
Flumper Barflusterbutt Wrote:No doubt there was some faulty intelligence. No doubt about that. But, there were some flat out blatant violations of the terms of that treaty. The one he signed to keep us from marching into Baghdad at the end of the first gulf war. We let him off really easy at the end of that war.
North Korea has been violating the same type of UN sanctions AND they have nukes but you don't want to think about that do you?.The UN didnt approve the current iraq invasion, they wanted to find evidence of WMD's before they did.We went around the same treaty iraq violated.I guess two wrongs do make a right.If we would have waited Iraq would be contained and under heavy sanctions and 2000 americans would not have died and we might have been able to concentrate on Bin Laden, the actual cause of 9\11.
A political question. - ClayRock - 06-08-2006
Flumper Barflusterbutt Wrote:Um. No.
um yes? to the <insert percentage> of citizens who get their news from those 24 hour news channels, thats all they talked about.
A political question. - Raiden - 06-08-2006
ClayRock Wrote:would you kill yourself or at least think before you submit a reply? you tard up every thread you post in.
Bird33 Wrote:exactly.Instead of cheap oil you get to foot the billion dollars a month bill we spend on some arab country that never attacked us.
one of you is a total retard.